Which are two applications not suitable for SQL?

Prepare for the FAST Enterprises IC Interview. Enhance your skills with flashcards and multiple-choice questions. Each question provides hints and detailed explanations. Excel in your interview!

Multiple Choice

Which are two applications not suitable for SQL?

Explanation:
SQL works best with structured, finite data and operations that act on whole sets of rows. When data could grow without bound, defining and maintaining a scalable, well-indexed relational model becomes impractical, so an infinitely sized database isn’t a good fit for SQL. Similarly, deeply nested or graph-like relationships require recursive traversal; while some SQL dialects offer recursion features, they’re not as natural or efficient for large or complex recursive hierarchies as tools designed for graph processing. That’s why those two scenarios aren’t ideal for SQL. The other options align more with SQL strengths: small data sets with simple joins, or data with a fixed schema that can be loaded into a relational model.

SQL works best with structured, finite data and operations that act on whole sets of rows. When data could grow without bound, defining and maintaining a scalable, well-indexed relational model becomes impractical, so an infinitely sized database isn’t a good fit for SQL. Similarly, deeply nested or graph-like relationships require recursive traversal; while some SQL dialects offer recursion features, they’re not as natural or efficient for large or complex recursive hierarchies as tools designed for graph processing. That’s why those two scenarios aren’t ideal for SQL. The other options align more with SQL strengths: small data sets with simple joins, or data with a fixed schema that can be loaded into a relational model.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy